path: root/src/arch/arm/verstage.ld
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* New mechanism to define SRAM/memory map with automatic bounds checkingJulius Werner2015-04-061-66/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout (primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation cannot go missing or out of date. The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include). BUG=None TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies with ToT and looked for red flags. Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614 Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
* build system: run linker scripts through the preprocessorPatrick Georgi2015-04-061-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows combining and simplifying linker scripts. This is inspired by the commit listed below, but rewritten to match upstream, and split in smaller pieces to keep intent clear. Change-Id: Ie5c11bd8495a399561cefde2f3e8dd300f4feb98 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Based-On-Change-Id: I50af7dacf616e0f8ff4c43f4acc679089ad7022b Based-On-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Based-On-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219170 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9303 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* vboot2: separate verstage from bootblockDaisuke Nojiri2015-03-241-0/+67
With CONFIG_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE false, the verstage loads the romstage over the bootblock, then exits to the romstage. this is necessary for some SOC (e.g. tegra124) which runs the bootblock on a different architecture. With CONFIG_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE true, the verstage returns to the bootblock. Then, the bootblock loads the romstage over the verstage and exits to the romstage. this is probably necessary for some SOC (e.g. rockchip) which does not have SRAM big enough to fit the verstage and the romstage at the same time. BUG=none TEST=Built Blaze with USE=+/-vboot2. Ran faft on Blaze. BRANCH=none Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Original-Change-Id: I673945c5e21afc800d523fbb25d49fdc83693544 Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/212365 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Note: This purposefully is probably broken in vendorcode/google/chromeos as I'm just trying to set a base for dropping more patches in. The vboot paths will have to change from how they are currently constructed. (cherry picked from commit 4fa17395113d86445660091413ecb005485f8014) Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Change-Id: I9117434ce99695f9b7021a06196d864f180df5c9 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8881 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>