path: root/src/arch/arm/include/arch/io.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Unify byte order macros and clrsetbitsJulius Werner2015-04-211-96/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch removes quite a bit of code duplication between cpu_to_le32() and clrsetbits_le32() style macros on the different architectures. This also syncs those macros back up to the new write32(a, v) style IO accessor macros that are now used on ARM and ARM64. CQ-DEPEND=CL:254862 BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:444723 TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Falco, Pinky, Pit, Rambi, Ryu, Storm and Urara. Booted on Jerry. Tried to compare binary images... unfortunately something about the new macro notation makes the compiler evaluate it more efficiently (not recalculating the address between the read and the write), so this was of limited value. Change-Id: If8ab62912c952d68a67a0f71e82b038732cd1317 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: fd43bf446581bfb84bec4f2ebb56b5de95971c3b Original-Change-Id: I7d301b5bb5ac0db7f5ff39e3adc2b28a1f402a72 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254866 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9838 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* arm(64): Change write32() argument order to match x86Julius Werner2015-04-211-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch changes the argument order for the (now temporarily unused) write32() accessor macro (and equivalents for other lengths) from (value, address) to (address, value) in order to conform with the equivalent on x86. Also removes one remaining use of write32() on ARM that slipped through since coccinelle doesn't inspect header files. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:444723 TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Pit, Ryu, Storm and Pinky. Change-Id: Id5739b144f6a5cfd40958ea68510dcf0b89fbfa9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: f02cae8b04f2042530bafc91346d11bb666aa42d Original-Change-Id: Ia91c2c19d8444e853a2fc12590a52c2b6447a1b9 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254863 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9835 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* arm(64): Replace write32() and friends with writel()Julius Werner2015-04-211-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch is a raw application of the following spatch to the directories src/arch/arm(64)?, src/mainboard/<arm(64)-board>, src/soc/<arm(64)-soc> and src/drivers/gic: @@ expression A, V; @@ - write32(V, A) + writel(V, A) @@ expression A, V; @@ - write16(V, A) + writew(V, A) @@ expression A, V; @@ - write8(V, A) + writeb(V, A) This replaces all uses of write{32,16,8}() with write{l,w,b}() which is currently equivalent and much more common. This is a preparatory step that will allow us to easier flip them all at once to the new write32(a,v) model. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:451388 TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Blaze, Pit, Ryu, Storm and Pinky. Change-Id: I16016cd77780e7cadbabe7d8aa7ab465b95b8f09 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 93f0ada19b429b4e30d67335b4e61d0f43597b24 Original-Change-Id: I1ac01c67efef4656607663253ed298ff4d0ef89d Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/254862 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9834 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm.Gabe Black2014-09-081-0/+94
There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)