From 07b1ad5a3aff71558274c5be4deef92105ea19a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hpa <hpa>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:11:52 +0000
Subject: MSDN says the 0x08 forms of the lock calls are OK for all
 filesystems, and that if one uses 0x48 one has to fall back to 0x08 anyway

---
 dos/syslinux.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

(limited to 'dos')

diff --git a/dos/syslinux.c b/dos/syslinux.c
index 7d3057df..e42432a8 100644
--- a/dos/syslinux.c
+++ b/dos/syslinux.c
@@ -167,8 +167,12 @@ void lock_device(int level)
   if ( dos_version < 0x0700 )
     return;			/* Win9x/NT only */
 
+#if 0
   /* DOS 7.10 = Win95 OSR2 = first version with FAT32 */
   lock_call = (dos_version >= 0x0710) ? 0x484A : 0x084A;
+#else
+  lock_call = 0x084A;		/* MSDN says this is OK for all filesystems */
+#endif
 
   while ( (uint8_t)lock_level < level ) {
     rv = 0x444d;
@@ -192,8 +196,12 @@ void unlock_device(int level)
   if ( dos_version < 0x0700 )
     return;			/* Win9x/NT only */
 
+#if 0
   /* DOS 7.10 = Win95 OSR2 = first version with FAT32 */
   unlock_call = (dos_version >= 0x0710) ? 0x486A : 0x086A;
+#else
+  unlock_call = 0x086A;		/* MSDN says this is OK for all filesystems */
+#endif
 
   while ( (uint8_t)lock_level > level ) {
     rv = 0x440d;
-- 
cgit