path: root/security/Kconfig
diff options
authorAndrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>2008-07-23 21:28:24 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2008-07-24 10:47:22 -0700
commit5459c164f0591ee75ed0203bb8f3817f25948e2f (patch)
tree7b17a0cbadfc487d7311b7f5a41779ff33d6fe7f /security/Kconfig
parent78ecba081224a2db5876b6b81cfed0b78f58adc7 (diff)
security: protect legacy applications from executing with insufficient privilege
When cap_bset suppresses some of the forced (fP) capabilities of a file, it is generally only safe to execute the program if it understands how to recognize it doesn't have enough privilege to work correctly. For legacy applications (fE!=0), which have no non-destructive way to determine that they are missing privilege, we fail to execute (EPERM) any executable that requires fP capabilities, but would otherwise get pP' < fP. This is a fail-safe permission check. For some discussion of why it is problematic for (legacy) privileged applications to run with less than the set of capabilities requested for them, see: http://userweb.kernel.org/~morgan/sendmail-capabilities-war-story.html With this iteration of this support, we do not include setuid-0 based privilege protection from the bounding set. That is, the admin can still (ab)use the bounding set to suppress the privileges of a setuid-0 program. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanup] Signed-off-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/Kconfig')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions