aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2010-04-15 12:50:39 -0700
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2010-04-19 08:37:19 +0200
commitbc293d62b26ec590afc90a9e0a31c45d355b7bd8 (patch)
tree4b61dee53e849f0ba1d5a7fef58522e224be836e /include
parent50aec0024eccb1d5f540ab64a1958eebcdb9340c (diff)
downloadmrst-s0i3-test-bc293d62b26ec590afc90a9e0a31c45d355b7bd8.tar.gz
mrst-s0i3-test-bc293d62b26ec590afc90a9e0a31c45d355b7bd8.tar.xz
mrst-s0i3-test-bc293d62b26ec590afc90a9e0a31c45d355b7bd8.zip
rcu: Make RCU lockdep check the lockdep_recursion variable
The lockdep facility temporarily disables lockdep checking by incrementing the current->lockdep_recursion variable. Such disabling happens in NMIs and in other situations where lockdep might expect to recurse on itself. This patch therefore checks current->lockdep_recursion, disabling RCU lockdep splats when this variable is non-zero. In addition, this patch removes the "likely()", as suggested by Lai Jiangshan. Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com LKML-Reference: <20100415195039.GA22623@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/rcupdate.h5
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 9f1ddfef84b..07db2feb857 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -101,10 +101,7 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
# define rcu_read_release_sched() \
lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
-static inline int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
-{
- return likely(rcu_scheduler_active && debug_locks);
-}
+extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
/**
* rcu_read_lock_held - might we be in RCU read-side critical section?